Volume 7, Issue 1, February 2019, Page: 8-12
Effects of Intra-Row Spacing and N Fertilizer Rates on Yield and Yield Components of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum L.) at Harawe, Eastern Ethiopia
Gezu Degefa, Department of Horticulture, Fedis Agricultural Research Center, Harar, Ethiopia
Gebisa Benti, Department of Horticulture, Fedis Agricultural Research Center, Harar, Ethiopia
Mohammed Jafar, Department of Horticulture, Fedis Agricultural Research Center, Harar, Ethiopia
Fikadu Tadesse, Department of Horticulture, Fedis Agricultural Research Center, Harar, Ethiopia
Habte Berhanu, Department of Horticulture, Fedis Agricultural Research Center, Harar, Ethiopia
Received: Dec. 26, 2018;       Accepted: Jan. 29, 2019;       Published: Feb. 21, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.jps.20190701.12      View  102      Downloads  64
Abstract
Improper plant spacing and nitrogen fertilizer are among the main factors which constrained productivity of the tomato. Due to this gap the experiment was proposed and conducted in Sofi district, Harari People Regional State, Ethiopia in 2016 and 2017 cropping season to investigate the effect of intra-row spacing and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and yield components of tomato. Experimental treatments were nitrogen rates (0, 39, 69 and 99 kg ha-1) and intra-row spacing (25, 30, 35 and 40cm). A total of 16 treatments were arranged in randomized complete block design with three replication. Melkashola Variety was used for the experiment. The results revealed that there were significant (P<0.05) differences for plant height, number of branches, fruit clusters per plant, number of fruits per plant due to nitrogen application. Increasing nitrogen rate from nil to 69 kg ha-1 increased all these parameters. Average fruit weight and fruit yield were significantly (P<0.05) affected due to the interaction effect of nitrogen and intra-row spacing. The highest fruit weight was recorded at 39 kg N ha-1 and 40cm intra-row spacing while the lowest were at 0 N and 40cm intra-row spacing. The highest fruit yield was recorded at 69 kg ha-1 N and 30cm intra-row spacing while the lowest was at 0 N and 40cm intra-row spacing. In conclusion, the application of 69 kg N ha-1and 30cm intra-row spacing recorded highest fruit yield with highest economic returns (270,330 birr ha-1). Based on fruit yield and economic return, combination of 69 kg N ha-1 and 30cm intra-row spacing was recommended for the study area and similar agro-ecology.
Keywords
Intra-row, Melkashola, Nitrogen, Spacing, Tomato
To cite this article
Gezu Degefa, Gebisa Benti, Mohammed Jafar, Fikadu Tadesse, Habte Berhanu, Effects of Intra-Row Spacing and N Fertilizer Rates on Yield and Yield Components of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum L.) at Harawe, Eastern Ethiopia, Journal of Plant Sciences. Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190701.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Abdel-Mawgoud N. H. M, Greadly E, Helmy Y I, Singer S. M. Responses of tomato plants to different rates of humic-based fertilizer and NPK fertilization. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2007;3 (2): 169-174.
[2]
Bruce, R. C., and Rayment, G. E. 1982. Analytical methods and interpretations used by the Agricultural Chemistry Branch for Soil and Land Use Surveys. Queens land Department of Primary Industries. Bulletin QB8 (2004), Indooroopilly, Queensland. Chemical fertilizers. Les. Envis. Newsl. 2004, 7, 4–5.
[3]
Daneshvar, M. H. 2000. Vegetables growing. Shahid-Chamran University Press, Persian.
[4]
Emerson, W. W. 1991. Structural decline of soil, assessment and prevention. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 29: 905–922.
[5]
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2004. Production year book.
[6]
Godfrey-Sam-Aggrey and Bereke Tsehi (eds.). Proceedings of the First Ethiopian Horticultural Workshop. Pp 236-249.
[7]
Godfrey-Sam-Aggrey, W. Turuwork A. and Tadelle A. 1985. Review of Tomato Research in Ethiopia and Proposal for future Research and Development direction. In.
[8]
Kirimi, J. K, Itulya, F. M. and Mwaja, V. N. 2011. Effects of nitrogen and spacing on fruit yield of tomato. African Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 5:50-60.
[9]
Lemma, D., Yayeh, Z. and Herath, E. 1992. Agronomic Studies in Tomato and Capsicum. In: Herath and Lemma (eds.). Horticulture Research and Development in Ethiopia: Proceedings of the Second National Horticultural Workshops of Ethiopia. 1-3 December. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp 153-163.
[10]
Mehla, C. P., Srivastava, V. K., Jage, S., Mangat, R., Singh, J. and Ram, M. 2000. Response of tomato varities to N and P fertilization and spacing. Indian Jornal of Agricultural Research. 34 (3): 182-184.
[11]
Metson, A. J. 1961. Methods of chemical analysis for soil survey samples. Soil Bureau Bulletin No. 12, New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, pp. 168–175. (Government Printer: Wellington, New Zealand).
[12]
Ogundare, S. K., Oloniruha, J. A., Ayodele, F. G. and Bello, I. A. (2015) Effect of different spacing and urea application rates on fruit nutrient composition, growth and yield of tomato in derived Savannah vegetation of Kogi State, Nigeria. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6, 2227-2233.
[13]
Olsen, S. R.; Cole, C. V.; Watanabe, F. S. and Deen, L. A. 1954. Estimation of available P in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA. Circ 939: 1-19.
[14]
Pandey, R. P, Solanki, P. N, Saraf R. K and Parihar, M. S. 1996. Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on growth and yield of tomato varieties. Punjab Vegetable Grower. 31: 1-5. Report. pp 1-4.
[15]
Sharma, K. C., Singh, A. K. and Sharma, S. K. 1999. Studies on Nitrogen and Phosphorus requirement of tomato hybrids. Annals of Agricultural Research. 20 (4): 339-402.
[16]
Teerapolvichitra, P. 1983. Effect of Plant Population Density on Tomato. ARC Training.
[17]
Tesfaye Balemi. 2008. Response of tomato cultivars differing in growth habit to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers and spacing on vertisol in Ethiopia. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 91 - 1, str. 103 - 119, DOI: 10.2478/v10014-008-0011-8.
[18]
Warner, H. 2003. Plant Spacing and Row Arrangement Affects Processing Tomato Yield. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
Browse journals by subject